An Agnostic's perspective - following the Bible for a year

Speaking at the most recent EG conference, author, philosopher, prankster and journalist A.J. Jacobs talks about the year he spent living biblically -- following the rules in the Bible as literally as possible.


2 comments

The Way to Life - Didache

The Didache is a late 1st century writing on the teachings of Jesus as taught by the 12 Apostles.  It was widely circulated by 100AD and read by many of the early Christian churches as scripture.  The Apostles were Jews, and we know from the Bible did not abandon Judaism practices, but continued to practice it with a renewed "Christian" perspective.   The Didache was more or less how the Apostles viewed their spiritual priorities and how they felt their Christian-Judaism should be adapted for Gentiles. Through much controversy however, it did not make the NT canon, and therefore is not commonly read today.

Nothing in it is contradictory to the New Testament Bible.  It is more or less NT Gospels 101... Love your neighbor, turn the other cheek, etc.  However what is most interesting is that it does not mention the diefication of Jesus, or many typical modern religious priorities.  I believe it should not be used to discredit modern Christian faith (Lord knows we have enough factions as it is), but rather to teach us all that living lowly and compassionately as Jesus did is more important than your intellectual beliefs.

The first 2 chapters sum up the entire book nicely.  I will paraphrase the 1st chapter here:


0 comments

The Way to Life - Didache

The Didache is a late 1st century writing on the teachings of Jesus as taught by the 12 Apostles.  It was widely circulated by 100AD and read by many of the early Christian churches as scripture.  The Apostles were Jews, and we know from the Bible did not abandon Judaism practices, but continued to practice it with a renewed "Christian" perspective.   The Didache was more or less how the Apostles viewed their spiritual priorities and how they felt their Christian-Judaism should be adapted for Gentiles. Through much controversy however, it did not make the NT canon, and therefore is not commonly read today.

Nothing in it is contradictory to the New Testament Bible.  It is more or less NT Gospels 101... Love your neighbor, turn the other cheek, etc.  However what is most interesting is that it does not mention the diefication of Jesus, or many typical modern religious priorities.  I believe it should not be used to discredit modern Christian faith (Lord knows we have enough factions as it is), but rather to teach us all that living lowly and compassionately as Jesus did is more important than your intellectual beliefs.

The first 2 chapters sum up the entire book nicely.  I will paraphrase the 1st chapter here:


0 comments

Ken Schei - Rescuing Jesus from the Bible

Don't let the title fool you.  Ken Schei is an Atheist, but that hasn't stopped him from collecting some very good information on the original message of Jesus.

Unlike Shei, most atheists that I have conversed with in my lifetime only seem interested in obliterating religion from the world.  Their goal more or less is to rob you of your faith, and replace it with nothing.  Statistics show however that communities with large numbers of atheists also have high rates of depression and suicide.  Whether true or not, healthy religion is good for the body, mind and soul.

Instead of being destructive, Schei has dug deeper into the scholarly history of Jesus' teachings, and instead of finding a resurected Son of God that must be worshiped, found an inspirational message of compassion.  The message that I believe is most beneficial to the world in which we live.


1 comments

A Contrarian Look at the Book of Mark

I have long believed that the biggest problem with religion today is that it has lost its purpose.  Religious people often debate things like science, evolution, liberalism or church doctrine, and lose sight of that which is most important.  The Bible for example is not a science book, its purpose is not to explain the origin of species, and it is definitely not a guideline for deciding which dogmatic faction of Christianity to belong to.  I believe it's purpose is to provide a history of the Jews and early Christians, and of their religious cultures.  And more importantly to teach us how to be moral, maintain good/healthy habits and how to treat, and not treat one another.  It teaches the mistakes and successes of 4000 years of Jewish men and women, so that we may use it as a guide to a more spiritual and vibrant life.

It is important to also understand that regardless of your specific faith, as long as it is peaceful, the benefits of possessing a devotion to that faith are essential. This article is simply a healthy, contrarian walk through the Book of Mark, that all people religious or not would benefit from understanding.


0 comments

Genesis Origins in Mesopotamia

The oldest written records of man’s earliest religious beliefs come from Ancient Mesopotamia. Located in and around what is today known as Southern Iraq, Mesopotamia dates back as early 8000BC. Mesopotamians developed the world’s first known cities as early as 4000BC, some of which become dynasties beginning in about 3000BC. Around 2000BC , one of these dynasties, Ur, is believed to have given birth to a man named Abraham, who later becomes the Father of the 3 popular Monotheistic faiths, Judaism, Christianity and Islam.


2 comments

Abrahamic History of Godly Men

This is a study from the Christian Bible, examining examples of how Godly men were judged not by their specific doctrine, but rather their heart.  There is also reason to believe that the Bible says that even non-Christians have a Godly sense of morality written on their hearts... And according to the Bible they will be judged by that, and not necessarily their beliefs.


0 comments

Biblical Creation Story

The goal of this post is to share some of the passages from the Bible that I don't completely understand. During the course of my study, somethings did not exactly add-up, given the context, it seemed as if there were other facts that might have been ommited. Thus I wanted to share and learn from others how they made sense of their study in the first 4 books of Genesis.


0 comments